Cases 1 - 10 of 28
BONHAGE et al v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVING LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
MARK S. BONHAGE and MARY S. BONHAGE
Defendant:
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVING LLC, U.S. BANK ASSOCIATION, JUDGE ASHLEY M. CHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
HAFNER et al v. PHELAN, HALLINAN, DIAMOND & JONES, LLP
as 2:2019cv01938
Defendant:
PHELAN, HALLINAN, DIAMOND & JONES, LLP
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAFNER and KRISTINA HAFNER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00478
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01547
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MCBRIDE et al v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv01401
Defendant:
PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES, LLP, BARBRA HALIN, MERSCORP HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
RACHEL L. MCBRIDE and AARON STRADER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
NELSON v. WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv05770
Plaintiff:
CHARLES NELSON
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK .N.A, PHELAN HALLINAN DIAMOND & JONES LLP and MATTHEW G. BRUSHWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RAUSO v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2017cv04721
Plaintiff:
GENNARO RAUSO
Defendant:
ANGELA MARTINEZ, DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT FOR THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, MARY MCFALL HOPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv03213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
