Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Clifton v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2011cv00260
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Clifton
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, Robert Bob Cooper, Gayle Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chance v. Tennessee Department Correction et al
as 3:2011cv00250
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Chance
Defendant:
Tennessee Department Correction, Hardeman County Local Government, Correctional Corporation of American and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2011mc00001
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Clifton
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, Robert Bob Cooper, Gayle Ray and others
Jones v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2010cv00793
Plaintiff:
Richard Jones
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, Robert Cooper, Jr., David H. Lillard, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooster v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2010cv00653
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Arabel Wooster
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, Gayle Ray, Jewel Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Maximus et al
as 3:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Maximus, Unum, Hugh O. Maclellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Maximus et al
as 3:2010cv00412
Plaintiff:
(f/n/u) Doe
Defendant:
Maximus, Unum, Hugh O. Maclellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2009cv01133
Plaintiff:
Cecil C. Johnson, Jr., Cecil C. Johnson, Jr. and Cecil C. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, George M. Little and Ricky J. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2009cv00897
Plaintiff:
Gabble Lee Mitchell
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, George M. Little, Roberta J. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson et al v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2009cv00618
Plaintiff:
Jamille Ferguson and Jamarius Ferguson
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, Viola P. Miller, Steve Hornsby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
