Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Benson v. Street et al
as 2:2011cv02438
Plaintiff:
Terry Benson
Defendant:
Christopher Street, Michael Bishop, Bobby Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devante v. Woods et al
as 2:2011cv02176
Plaintiff:
Allison Devante
Defendant:
Paul Woods, Timothy Rush, Tonia Cope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Jones et al
as 2:2011cv02175
Plaintiff:
Erique Richardson
Defendant:
T. Jones, C. Turner, D. Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. TN State Trooper et al
as 2:2010cv02818
Plaintiff:
Glenn R. Wright
Defendant:
TN State Trooper, U.S. Techno Sat. Div., Shelby County Sheriff Metro Satellite Div. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2010cv00793
Plaintiff:
Richard Jones
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, Robert Cooper, Jr., David H. Lillard, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
:harry-poole el-bey: and Native Olmec Anasazi Almoroccan Heritage Institute v. Rogers et al
as 2:2010cv02502
Plaintiff:
:harry-poole el-bey: and Native Olmec Anasazi Almoroccan Heritage Institute
Defendant:
L. Rogers, Larry Godwin, AC Wharton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Maximus et al
as 3:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Maximus, Unum, Hugh O. Maclellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Maximus et al
as 3:2010cv00412
Plaintiff:
(f/n/u) Doe
Defendant:
Maximus, Unum, Hugh O. Maclellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El Bey v. Bredesen et al
as 2:2010cv02217
Plaintiff:
Terry: Lawrence-Benson El Bey
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen and A.C. Wharton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Powell v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Powell
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Phil Bredesen, Tennessee Department of Children's Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
