Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Saine v. Bramlett et al
as 1:2019cv01155
Defendant:
Sergeant John Doe, John Doe, Major John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Harmon Saine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nutt v. Sexual Offender Registration Review Board et al
as 1:2018cv03048
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lawrence Nutt
Defendant:
Tracy Alvord, Gerard Armorer, Jessica Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of James Williams et al v. Douglas County et al
as 1:2016cv02913
Plaintiff:
Estate of James Williams , Asasa Rasheed Williams , Farod Williams and others
Defendant:
Douglas County , Douglas County Sheriffs Office , Douglas County Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinkley v. Gulledge et al
as 4:2015cv00247
Plaintiff:
James Hinkley
Defendant:
Gary Gulledge , Phil Miller , William Michael Whitley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen v. Miller et al
as 1:2014cv01192
Plaintiff:
Laura Y. Allen
Defendant:
Phil Miller , S. Brook and Matthew Christopher Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Fanning v. Warrington et al
as 1:2014cv00315
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Fanning
Defendant:
Deputy Warrington and Phil Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFarlin v. Douglas County Georgia et al
as 1:2013cv02002
Plaintiff:
Clarence McFarlin, Jr.
Defendant:
Douglas County Georgia, Phil Miller, City of Douglasville, Georgia and others
Presnell v. Douglas County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2013cv01771
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Presnell
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff Office, Phil Miller, Marco Antonio Miranda-Perez and others
Stevenson v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kinney R. Stevenson
Defendant:
Phil Miller, John Doe, Correctional Medical Services and others
Carlson v. Douglas County Sheriff Dept., et al
as 1:2012cv02352
Plaintiff:
Glenn R. Carlson
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff Dept., et al and Phil Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
