Cases 21 - 30 of 74
JOINER v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67670
Plaintiff:
JOE JOINER
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AIRCO INC/BOC GROUP THE, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
ROBERTS v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67610
Plaintiff:
BERNARD G ROBERTS
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , ANACONDA CORP , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
ABITZ v. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv61936
Plaintiff:
GERALD ABITZ
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON COMPANY , ACANDS INC, CROSSFIELD CSR LTD and others
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Plaintiff:
Joe T. Summerlin
Defendant:
Celotex Corporation , Raymark Industries, Inc. , Armstrong World Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saffold v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 1:2007cv00598
Defendant:
Acands Inc., Amchem Products Inc., Armstrong World Indu. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson B. Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARTEL et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv37525
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
Phyllis Bradley, et al. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72919
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Bradley
Evelyn Custis, et al. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72920
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Custis
Jeanne Kollar, et al. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72929
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Kollar
Virginia Marvel, et al. v. Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-72925
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Corning Corporation
Plaintiff:
Virginia Marvel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
