Civil Rights Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Shaw v. Dental Practice of Cordova et al
as 2:2024cv02268
Plaintiff: Tekeva Shaw
Defendant: Dental Practice of Cordova, Mid-South Oral Surgery, Christ Community Broad Dental and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00070
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00641
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00661
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv01050
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bansal v. Rainbow Enterprise, PLC et al
as 3:2019cv01001
Plaintiff: Dr. Vidya Bansal
Defendant: Rainbow Enterprise, PLC and Dr. Satish Prabhu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02814
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02734
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hastings v. State of Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02687
Plaintiff: Nedra Hastings
Defendant: Shelby County Government, Jimmy Moore, Van Sturdivant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02678
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?