Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Poe v. Vanwynsberg
as 4:2024cv04083
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
. Vanwynsberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Osmundson et al
as 4:2024cv04084
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
Kurt Osmundson, . Shinn and . Kramer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Trusewych
as 3:2023cv03049
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
Zorian Trusewych
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
Bradley Smith and . Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Wessel et al
as 3:2023cv03020
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
. Wessel and . Poole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe v. Lingering et al
as 3:2023cv03009
Plaintiff:
Joshua Poe
Defendant:
. Lingering, . Kirk, . Manton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poe et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00689
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Leslie Poe and Karen Poe
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NBA Properties, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv05521
Plaintiff:
NBA Properties, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Hipster hip-hop Store, PiZhouShiShengZhiTaiDianYingYuan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Hall v. Rosenbarun et al
as 1:2019cv00417
Defendant:
Officer Rosenbarun, City Of Evanston, Officer Ozafzelske and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Gregory Hall and Gregory Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
