Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Prather v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Iesha Prather
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Prather v. State of Georgia
as 3:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Johnny Isaiah Prather
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Prather v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv05103
Plaintiff:
James Robert Prather, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Illinois Union Insurance Company et al v. Skipper et al
as 1:2023cv04934
Plaintiff:
Illinois Union Insurance Company
Defendant:
Elix Skipper, Samantha Walker, Stacey Colin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Simmons et al v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Maria Simmons, Thanh Le, Timothy Baldwin and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
STANLEY v. WHITENTIN et al
as 5:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
ALVIN GAMAR STANLEY
Defendant:
WARDEN WHITENTIN, WARDEN BARNETT, WARDEN SPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Wood
as 3:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Tyler Prather
Defendant:
Sheriff Lenn Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Tyler J. Prather
Defendant:
CCSO Officer 341 Smith, Officer Izzo, Captain Hems and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prather v. Woodie et al
as 3:2021cv00027
Plaintiff:
Darnell Lee Prather
Defendant:
Troup County Sheriff's Office Administration and Angela Woodie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALPHONSE v. PRATHER et al
as 4:2020cv00052
Defendant:
JEREMY MCCULLOUGH, DANIELLE FORTE, MARC DANTONIO and others
Plaintiff:
TYRUS KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
