Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Akers v. Prolink Healthcare, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Denise Akers
Defendant:
Prolink Healthcare, LLC, Presbyterian Hospital ASC, LLC and Presbyterian Healthcare Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Stone v. New Mexico Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00798
Defendant:
New Mexico Department of Corrections, Presbyterian Hospital, The Geo Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bayward Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Grass v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2019cv00983
Defendant:
Matt Pohl, Manny Gonzales, Presbyterian Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
James Grass
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Mayfield v. Presbyterian Hospital et al
as 1:2019cv00948
Defendant:
Bernalillo County Sheriff, Metropolitan Detention Center, Presbyterian Hospital and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Mayfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mayfield v. Presbyterian Hospital Administration et al
as 1:2017cv00398
Plaintiff:
Earl R. Mayfield
Defendant:
Presbyterian Hospital Administration, BSO Sheriff Department, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gabaldon v. Presbyterian Hospital et al
as 1:2017cv00128
Plaintiff:
David A. Gabaldon
Defendant:
Presbyterian Hospital, Timothy R Duran, Christopher Gavaldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. Presbyterian Healthcare Services
as 1:2015cv00873
Plaintiff:
Michael Acevedo
Defendant:
Presbyterian Healthcare Services, Presbyterian Hospital and ABQ Ambulance Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duran v. Curry County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2009cv00758
Plaintiff:
Leo L Duran
Defendant:
Curry County Adult Detention Center, Presbyterian Hospital, FNU Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ysais v. Richardson et al
as 1:2007cv00287
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ysais
Defendant:
Bill Richardson, Mary-Dale Bolson, Karen Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
