Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant - Appellee:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP, as successor by merger to Buffalo Pump, Inc., ARVINMERITOR INC, FKA Arvin Industries Inc, individually and as successor by merger to Rockwell International, BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, FKA Borg Warner Inc and others
Linda Hammell v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp, et al
as 15-2643
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA HAMMELL, individually and as Executrix and Executrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Arthur Hammell
Defendant:
CARRIER CORP, TODD SHIPYARDS, individually and for its Todd Combustion Division formerly known as American Standard, Inc., successor-ininterest to Kewanee Boiler Corp., EATON CORP, as successor-in-interest to Cutler-Hammer, Inc. agent ofn/k/a Eaton Electrical, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CBS CORP, a Delaware Corporation, f/k/a Viacom, Inc., individually and as successor by merger to CBS Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, f/k/a Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO, successor to Jenkins Valves, Inc. also known as Jenkins Bros., FOSTER WHEELER CORP and others
DECOURCEY et al v. ABB INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06337
Plaintiff:
THOMAS DECOURCEY and CAROL DECOURCEY
Defendant:
ABB INC., CARRIER CORPORATION , CBS CORPORATION and others
Cross_claimant:
CARRIER CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
ABB INC., CBS CORPORATION , CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAMMELL et al v. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION et al
as 3:2014cv00013
Cross Claimant:
ARVINMERITOR, INC., CBS CORPORATION, CRANE CO. and others
Defendant:
BORG WARNER MORSE TEC, CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
PNEUMO-ABEX, LLC., STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC., GENERAL CABLE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR HAMMELL and LINDA HAMMELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Bel Air Lighting, Inc. v. Progressive Lighting, Inc., et al
as 12-14958
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BEL AIR LIGHTING, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
PROGRESSIVE LIGHTING, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC., all North Carolina corporations
Progressive Lighting, Inc. v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., et al
as 11-14640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PROGRESSIVE LIGHTING, INC., a Georgia Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC., all North Carolina corporations and BEL AIR LIGHTING, INC.
Bel Air Lighting, Inc. v. Progressive Lighting, Inc.
as 11-13838
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BEL AIR LIGHTING, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
PROGRESSIVE LIGHTING, INC.
Claimant - Appellee:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC., all North Carolina corporations,
CRATER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv66775
Plaintiff:
DONALD CRATER and ROBERTA CRATER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC., ALPHA WIRE CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANK S. LA FAUCI et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv66336
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, CARRIER CORPORATION, CBS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK S. LA FAUCI and LUCILLE LA FAUCI
Cross Defendant:
ELECTRIC SWITCHBOARD CO.,INC., ELLIOTT TURBOMACHINERY CO., FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Respondent:
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. and AT&T CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Crater et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2011cv03588
Plaintiff:
Donald Crater and Roberta Crater
Defendant:
3M Company , Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Alpha Wire Corp. and others
Cross_claimant:
3M Company and General Wire Products, Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Eaton Electrical, Inc., The Trane Company , J.H. France Refractories Co. and others
Counter_claimant:
3M Company
Counter_defendant:
Donald Crater and Roberta Crater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
