Cases 1 - 10 of 11
USA v. Anthony Pryor
as 22-2738
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY PRYOR
USA v. Anthony Pryor
as 17-3288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANTHONY PRYOR, also known as ANT
Hector Velez v. United States Department of Ho
as 13-3926
Plaintiff - Appellee:
HECTOR VELEZ, CATHERINE NIXON, CLARENCE PITTS, on behalf of themselves, and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT C. ROSENBERG, CYNTHIA CHAPPELL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Dennis Pryor v. Meg Yatauro, et al
as 13-2641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS PRYOR
Defendant - Appellee:
MEG A. YATAURO and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Frederick Banks v. A. Whitaker, et al
as 11-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
A WHITAKER, Teacher, J TENOR, Education Supervisor, B STEELE, Teacher and others
David Lusick v. David Lawrence, et al
as 11-1880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GEORGE LUSICK
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID LAWRENCE, Court Adminstrator, JOSEPH H. EVERS, Prothonatary, VIVIAN T. MILLER, Clerk of Quarter Sessions and others
James Anderson v. Pamela Cohen
as 10-4442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ANDERSON, AKA Hendel
Defendant - Appellee:
PAMELA PRYOR COHEN, a/k/a Pamela Pryor Dembe
Bloomfield Condo Assoc LLC v. Dennis Drasco
as 10-2726
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BLOOMFIELD CONDO ASSOC LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS J. DRASCO, individually, and in his capacity as Special Fiscal Agent
Not Party - Appellant:
PRYOR CASHMAN LLP
USA v. Naim Pryor
as 09-2389
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NAIM PRYOR
USA v. Naim Pryor
as 08-4357
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
NAIM PRYOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
