Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Phelps v. Tekulve et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jimica D Phelps
Defendant:
Mark J Tekulve, Barbara Wiedenbein, Zach Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pryor v. Capital One
as 1:2023cv02413
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Pryor
Defendant:
Capital One
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pryor v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 4:2023cv02259
Plaintiff:
Nc LaFonse Pryor and Norman LaFonte Pryor
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Lieutinent Arianna Brock, M. Darkangelo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Pryor et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Travis Pryor and Suzanne Pryor
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pryor, v. Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2021cv05595
Plaintiff:
Tylesha Lorrie Pryor,
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haines et al v. Greenfield Exempted Village Schools Board of Education et al
as 1:2021cv00688
Plaintiff:
Olivia Haines, Isabella Haines, Kimberly McGuire-Haines and others
Defendant:
Greenfield Exempted Village Schools Board of Education, Greenfield Exempted Village Schools District, Quincey Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pryor v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03295
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Pryor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pryor v. Erdos
as 5:2020cv02863
Respondent:
Warden Ronald Erdos
Petitioner:
Norman Pryor, Norman LaFonte Pryor and Nc LaFonse Pryor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02545
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
