Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lassiter v. State of Tennessee, et al
as 2:2018cv02304
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Lassiter
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Memphis Police Department, Shelby County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02479
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Huddle v. Honoski et al
as 2:2015mc00016
Plaintiff:
Larry Keith Huddle, Jr.
Defendant:
Amy M. Honoski and Sullivan County Public Defender's Office
Huddle v. Honoski et al
as 2:2015cv00291
Plaintiff:
Larry Keith Huddle, Jr.
Defendant:
Amy M. Honoski and Sullivan County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redwine v. Rutherford County Public Defender's Office
as 3:2015cv00598
Petitioner:
Jason Lowell Redwine
Respondent:
Rutherford County Public Defender's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rowan v. Department of Justice et al
as 2:2015cv02208
Plaintiff:
Brent A. Rowan
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Public Defender's Office, Jail Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. State Public Defender Office et al
as 3:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
Darrell Ray, Sr.
Defendant:
State Public Defender's Office, Michael Engle and (f/n/u) Blackburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Department of Probation et al
as 1:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Charles Dwayne Jackson
Defendant:
Department of Probation, Jamie Staggs, Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maur v. Shelby County District Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2014cv02345
Plaintiff:
Assad Maur
Defendant:
Shelby County District Attorney's Office, Shelby County Public Defender's Office, Shelby County Criminal Court Clerk's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
