Cases 1 - 10 of 18
THORNTON v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DENTAL AND MEDICAL DEPARTMENT AT PULASKI STATE PRISON and DENTAL AND MEDICAL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REEVES v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2020cv00277
Defendant:
PULASKI STATE PRISON, SUPERVISOR, EASTMAN CITY CONTRACT DETAIL and others
Plaintiff:
NICOLE JOLITA REEVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REEVES v. JORDAN et al
as 5:2020cv00032
Defendant:
PULASKI STATE PRISON, EASTMAN CITY and VICKEY JORDAN
Plaintiff:
NICOLE JOLITA REEVES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Debra Hines v. Melvin Butts, et al
as 20-10252
Defendant / Appellee:
MELVIN BUTTS, Security Pulaski State Prison, MIGUEL STUBBS and FABRON ROBERTS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBRA D. HINES
BANDA-LOPEZ v. DOES
as 5:2019cv00305
Plaintiff:
MISTY SUNSHINE BANDA-LOPEZ and MISTY MORAN
Defendant:
PULASKI STATE PRISON, HABERSHAM MEDICAL EMERGENCY ROOM, JOHN AND OR JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00072
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
FEDD v. PULASKI STATE PRISON
as 1:2017cv00118
Petitioner:
NEOTHA FEDD
Respondent:
PULASKI STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lin Davis, Sr. v. Pulaski State Prison, et al
as 17-11155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIN EDWARD DAVIS, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PULASKI STATE PRISON, THOMAS COUNTY JAIL, SHERIFF CARLTON POWELL and others
Deborah Hines v. Nazaire, et al
as 17-10093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBORAH HINES
Defendant - Appellee:
NAZAIRE, Pulaski State Prison, BILLY NICHOLS and GEORGIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE
Welch v. Pulaski State Prison
as 4:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
Maria Wiggins Welch
Defendant:
Pulaski State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
