Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Arnold v. FC Hunters Glen et al
as 1:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Arnold
Defendant:
FC Hunters Glen doing business as Waters Edge Apartments, Weller Management, Adam Joffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Pumphrey v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv01800
Petitioner:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pumphrey v. Maddox
as 1:2023cv01801
Petitioner:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pumphrey v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Defendant:
Judge Courtney Johnson, District Attorney Joseph Lenoff and Attorney Ingrid McGaughey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pumphrey v. DeBerry
as 1:2023cv00647
Plaintiff:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Defendant:
Debra DeBerry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pumphrey v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00036
Petitioner:
Alexando Pumphrey
Respondent:
Judge Courtney Johnson, District Attorney Joseph Lenoff and Attorney Ingrid McGaughey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pumphrey v. Deberry
as 1:2022cv05061
Plaintiff:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Defendant:
Debra Deberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFaddin et al v. Pumphrey DDS P.C. et al
as 1:2022cv01778
Defendant:
David W. Pumphrey DDS P.C. also known as Pumphrey Periodontics doing business as Dental Implant Therapy, Pumphrey Periodontics and David W. Pumphrey
Plaintiff:
Laneice S. McFaddin and Melissa L. Stewart
Pumphrey v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
Alexando Van Pumphrey
Defendant:
Judge Courtney Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pumphrey v. Unnamed Respondent
as 1:2014cv02413
Petitioner:
Alexando Pumphrey
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
