Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jordan v. Barves et al
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerome Jordan
Defendant:
J. Barves, J. Pumphrey, Lt. Bardo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PUMPHREY v. CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv00647
Plaintiff:
ROGER ALLEN PUMPHREY
Defendant:
CAMPBELL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
PUMPHREY v. ASTRUE
as 2:2011cv00472
Plaintiff:
KATHY JO PUMPHREY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PUMPHREY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55302
Plaintiff:
GEORGE B. PUMPHREY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PUMPHREY v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTO DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2010cv42217
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE PUMPHREY
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTO DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PUMPHREY v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv41874
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE PUMPHREY
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PUMPHREY v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2010cv41923
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE PUMPHREY
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PUMPHREY v. A. L. BURBANK AND COMPANY, LIMITED et al
as 2:2010cv37905
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE PUMPHREY
Defendant:
A. L. BURBANK AND COMPANY, LIMITED, AMERCARGO, INCORPORATED, AMERICAN LEADER, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PUMPHREY et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY)
as 2:2009cv84666
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE COMPANY, A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), VIACOM INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROY GARLAND PUMPHREY and RUTH PUMPHREY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUMPHREY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2009cv00233
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW LEE PUMPHREY
Defendant:
SMITH, JEFF RUDITIS and FOSTER LYLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
