Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kiton Corporation v. PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2021cv11265
Plaintiff:
Kiton Corporation
Defendant:
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KITON CORPORATION v. PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 3:2021cv11265
Plaintiff:
KITON CORPORATION
Defendant:
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TESLOVICH v. CHUBB INSURANCE GROUP et al
as 2:2020cv01132
Plaintiff:
GEORGE M. TESLOVICH, JR.
Defendant:
CHUBB INSURANCE GROUP and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAILWAY SPECIALTY CORPORATION v. PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2019cv04091
Plaintiff:
RAILWAY SPECIALTY CORPORATION
Defendant:
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEIN et al v. PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2018cv02442
Plaintiff:
ERIC STEIN and TINA STEIN
Defendant:
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FONTANA v. PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2018cv00516
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL FONTANA
Defendant:
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv00830
Plaintiff:
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY and CHUBB INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZAROUR et al v. CHUBB & SON, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv05361
Plaintiff:
SIMON ZAROUR and LORI ZAROUR
Defendant:
CHUBB & SON, INC. and PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY v. SUPERIOR PLUS ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2012cv05620
Plaintiff:
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant:
SUPERIOR PLUS ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SYDNEY et al v. PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
as 2:2012cv01897
Plaintiff:
A. DAVID SYDNEY and PATRICIA SYDNEY
Defendant:
PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
