Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rodriguez v. Agent Cain et al
as 3:2023cv01460
Plaintiff:
James Rodriguez, Jr.
Defendant:
Agent Cain, Agent Graham, Agent McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWIS v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 2:2022cv04965
Plaintiff:
SAMMEISO LEONARD LEWIS
Defendant:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, GAVIN NEWSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff:
RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant:
RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BELFI v. BANCORP et al
as 2:2021cv05672
Plaintiff:
ALEX BELFI
Defendant:
RADIUS BANCORP, ASPIRATION FINANCIAL, LLC, THOMAS WAGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv03113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROMAN SOTO v. PERK et al
as 2:2017cv02193
Plaintiff:
RAMON E. ROMAN SOTO
Defendant:
MATHEW PERK, CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, (1 TO 100 JOHN DOES) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WATKINS et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00060
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BOB JACKSON, NANA WRIGHT-PADILLA and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD WATKINS , SR and DONALD WATKINS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
