Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ritchie v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv04216
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Pamala Swartz, Thomas Pryor and others
Plaintiff:
John Ritchie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kingston DA GOD f/k/a JC Bryant v. Corizon Medical Services et al
as 2:2016cv04314
Plaintiff:
Universal-Unison A Kingston DA GOD f/k/a JC Bryant
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services, Krystal Houston, Pamala Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guest v. Laramore et al
as 2:2016cv04254
Plaintiff:
Antwon Guest
Defendant:
Wanda Laramore, Corizon Corporation, Krystal Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Meloy et al
as 4:2015cv00634
Defendant:
Ronald E. Meloy, Pamala K. Meloy, James A. Meloy and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Ashurst et al v. J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00803
Plaintiff:
Stahr Ashurst , Valerie Arrocha , LeAnn M. Belew and others
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC , JP Morgan Chase & Co. , J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Ashurst et al v. J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv01244
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Retirement Plan Services, LLC , JP Morgan Chase & Co. , J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stahr Ashurst , Valerie Arrocha , LeAnn M. Belew and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hope et al v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 4:2010cv00142
Plaintiff:
Tracie Hope, Michael P Meyer, Pamala J Meyer and others
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. and Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Voyles v. Baker et al
as 2:2009cv04032
Plaintiff:
David Voyles
Defendant:
Thomas A Baker and Pamala S Swartz
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
