Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Williams v. Commonwealth of Graves County et al
as 5:2021cv00021
Defendant:
Ritchie Kemp, Scott Robinson, Hon. Deborah Crooks and others
Plaintiff:
Parnell Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scales v. Kentucky State Reformatory et al
as 3:2017cv00384
Plaintiff:
Parnell F. Scales
Defendant:
Kentucky State Reformatory, Aaron Smith, Correctional Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell v. First Baptist Church et al
as 5:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
Clarence L. Russell
Defendant:
First Baptist Church, Jeff Bowman, Centri-Kid Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Parnell et al
as 5:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Ricky Parnell and Daniel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shead v. Fulton County Detention Center et al
as 5:2017cv00004
Plaintiff:
Marcellus Jerome Shead
Defendant:
Fulton County Detention Center, Jeff Johnson, Daniel Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Parnell et al
as 5:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Joshua Aaron Gamble
Defendant:
Ricky Parnell, Fulton County, Kentucky, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roark v. Parnell et al
as 5:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
Cecil Roark, II
Defendant:
Nick Parnell, Jeff Johnson, David Galiger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair v. Parnell et al
as 5:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Blair
Defendant:
Ricky Parnell, Fulton County Detention Center, Fulton County Deputy Jailer John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Parnell et al
as 5:2016cv00023
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Madden
Defendant:
Ricky Parnell and Jeff Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Parnell et al
as 5:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Ralph Hodges, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Parnell, Daniel Thomas and Advance Correctional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
