Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Parsons v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02153
Plaintiff:
Dan Parsons
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parsons v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01291
Plaintiff:
KEITH PARSONS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montalbano v. Honor Health et al
as 2:2022cv03758
Defendant:
Laura Lee Martinez, Honor Health, Arizona Premier Surgery and others
Plaintiff:
Alfred Joseph Montalbano, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Wrongful Death
Parsons v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03747
Plaintiff:
Randall Parsons
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Guillard et al v. Pyle et al
as 2:2022cv01960
Plaintiff:
Gezelle Guillard, John Peterson and Toshalyn Murray
Defendant:
Tom Pyle, Justin Elekes, Kayla Frost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Parsons v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01230
Plaintiff:
Drema Parsons
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Parsons v. Federal Card Services, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00764
Plaintiff:
Brandon Parsons
Defendant:
Federal Card Services, LLC and Luis Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parsons v. Federal Card Services, LLC et al
as 1:2021oe00765
Plaintiff:
Brandon Parsons
Defendant:
Federal Card Services, LLC and Luis Estrada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parsons v. Fender
as 3:2021cv02239
Petitioner:
cullen parsons
Respondent:
Warden Douglas Fender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quinonez v. IMI Material Handling Logistics Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plinio Alvarado Quinonez
Defendant:
John Doe 7, Justin Parsons, Laporte Consultants Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
