Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Braxton et al v. Apperson, Crump & Maxwell, PLLC et al
as 2:2012cv02761
Defendant:
Apperson, Crump & Maxwell, P.L.C., Robert Dinkelspiel, Robert Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Vivian Braxton , Otis Braxton and Pee Wee Wisdom Child Development Center, Inc.
Receiver:
Robert Dinkelspiel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
John Partee, et al v. Tommy Callahan, et al
as 10-5591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PARTEE and FANNIE PARTEE, husband and wife
Defendant - Appellee:
TOMMY L. CALLAHAN, individually and in his capacity as an officer or agent of the Memphis Police Department and CITY OF MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE
Bowman et al v. City of Gadsden, Alabama
as 2:2009cv02464
Plaintiff:
John Bowman, Chris Crisler, Steve Daniel and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
White v. Herenton et al
as 2:2008cv02415
Plaintiff:
Martha W. White
Defendant:
Willie Herenton, Memphis Housing Authority, Robert Lipscomb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Partee et al v. Callahan et al
as 2:2008cv02246
Plaintiff:
John Partee, John Partee, Fannie Partee and others
Defendant:
Tommy L. Callahan, City of Memphis, Tennessee and City of Memphis, Tennessee
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith et al -v- The County of Nassau et al
as 2:2007cv04999
Plaintiff:
Eric Smith and Hesekia McConneghey
Defendant:
The County Of Nassau, Nassau County Police Department, James Lawrence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
