Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Akula v. Cassidy et al
as 2:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Shiva Akula
Defendant:
Bernard Cassidy, Palmetto GBA, LLC, Kelly Melech Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Akula v. Cassidy et al
as 0:2023cv60034
Plaintiff:
Shiva Akula
Defendant:
Bernard Cassidy, Palmetto GBA, LLC, Kelly Melech Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Perez v. Szajkovics et al
as 1:2017cv00340
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Sandor Szajkovics, Passages Hospice, LLC, Passages Hospice, LLC Dental Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
GREENE et al v. PASSAGES HOSPICE, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00992
Defendant:
CRAIG J. FRANK, MICHAEL GILLMAN, SETH GILLMAN and others
Plaintiff:
NANCY GREENE, KRISTA GRUBER, ANN MCKENZIE HUGHES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Vacco v. Passages Hospice, LLC
as 1:2014cv02104
Defendant:
Passages Hospice, LLC
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vacco
Cause Of Action: Worker Adjustment and Restraining Notification Act
OSF Healthcare System v. Passages Hospice LLC Employee Benefit Plan
as 1:2013cv01480
Plaintiff:
OSF Healthcare System
Defendant:
Passages Hospice LLC Employee Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Woodruff v. Passages Hospice LLC et al
as 3:2011cv03453
Plaintiff:
Candice Woodruff
Defendant:
Passages Hospice LLC, Seth Gillman and Michael Gillman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
