Cases 51 - 60 of 79
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00066
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, CRPN Aplinlin, Jennifer McCovery and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kenneth Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Kay Ivey and Jefferson S. Dunn
Plaintiff:
Willie Kevin Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00047
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Lt. Clemmons, Sgt. Logan and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Patrick Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00045
Defendant:
State of Alabama, D.O.C., Steven T. Marshall and Patrice Richie Jones
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00043
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall, Patrice Richie Jones and State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Derrick Marcel Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cole v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, R. Carter, Lt. Robbins and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelvin Peacock v. Jefferson Dunn, et al
as 21-10072
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., Medical Provider, JARRED, in her individual capacity, JEFFERSON S. DUNN, Commissioner, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELVIN PEACOCK
Kister v. Robbins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv01070
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones and Lt. Robbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simon v. Jones et al (INMATE 1) (MEMBER)
as 2:2020cv00850
Defendant:
Captain Carter, Waylon Cousins, C. S. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kister v. Jackson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00757
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Lt. Jackson, Aundra Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
