Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Gilliam v. Lynch et al
as 1:2021cv05263
Defendant:
Patrick J. Lynch, CITY OF NEW YORK, Jane Doe NYPD Officer who ordered a Strawberry Shake and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Gilliam, Catherina Irving and Randy Grullon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynch v. National Prescription Administ
as 19-523
Defendant / Appellee:
National Prescription Administrators, Inc., Express Scripts, Inc. and John Does, 1 through 25
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Patrick J. Lynch, as Trustee of the Health and Welfare Fund of the Patrolmens's Benevolent Association of the City of New York and The Retiree Health & Welfare Fund of the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, on behalf of himse
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lynch v. The City of New York
as 12-3089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Patrick J. Lynch, as President of the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc. and Patrolmen's Benevolent Association, of the City of New York, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department and Raymond W. Kelly, Police Commissioner of the New York City Police Department
Gutierrez v. Sunovetti et al
as 1:2008cv01742
Plaintiff:
Javier Gutierrez
Defendant:
Edward Sunovetti, Weber, Mr. Raymond Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lynch et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2007cv09337
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Lynch and Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc.
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Police Department and Raymond W. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
