Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Shenika Fuller v. Patrick Donahoe
as 15-10334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHENIKA N. FULLER
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK R. DONAHOE, United States Postal Service Postmaster General
Bolden v. Donahoe
as 4:2015cv00295
Plaintiff:
Mechelle Bolden
Defendant:
Patrick R Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vance v. Donahoe
as 3:2014cv04278
Plaintiff:
Cheryl E Vance
Defendant:
Patrick R Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tamara Young v. USPS, et al
as 14-51110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAMARA L. YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Through Patrick R. Donahoe, Post Master General, AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO and AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION AFL-CIO, SAN ANTONIO ALAMO AREA LOCAL
Ledesma v. Donahoe
as 2:2014cv00058
Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahoe
Plaintiff:
Rosa Ledesma
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Jones v. Donahoe
as 4:2014cv01177
Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahoe
Plaintiff:
Sterling H. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Young v. United Stated Postal Service, et al
as 5:2014cv00113
Defendant:
American Postal Workers Union AFL-CIO, American Postal Workers Union AFL-CIO, San Antonio Alamo Area Local and United Stated Postal Service, Through Patrick R. Donahoe, Post Master General
Plaintiff:
Tamara L. Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Galle v. Donahoe
as 1:2013cv00260
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Galle
Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1) National Labor Relations Act
Callies v. Donahoe
as 4:2012cv03710
Plaintiff:
Larry Callies
Defendant:
Patrick R. Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Daniel Berthelot v. American Postal Workers Union, et al
as 12-20186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL J. BERTHELOT
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, Local 185, JOHN E. POTTER, in his official capacity as Postmaster General, United States Postal Service and PATRICK R. DONAHOE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
