Cases 21 - 30 of 38
McKenzie Hopkins v. Patricia Goins-Johnson
as 16-7410
Petitioner - Appellant:
MCKENZIE HOPKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA GOINS-JOHNSON, Warden, Patuxent Institution, Jessup, Maryland and BRIAN E. FROSH, Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Respondent:
MARYLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03230
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fisher v. Johnson et al
as 1:2016cv02157
Plaintiff:
Michael Fisher
Defendant:
Orlando Johnson and Unknown Patuxent Institution Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. Division of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv01253
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Division of Corrections, Clifton T Pirkins Hospital, Patuxent Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. Dash et al
as 1:2016cv00675
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Dr. Dash, Dr. Moghe, Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Patuxent Institution et al
as 1:2015cv03221
Plaintiff:
David Michael Montgomery
Defendant:
Patuxent Institution, Warden, Psy Doctors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2015cv03143
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Division of Corrections/Patuxent Institution, Dr. Moghe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanahan v. Patuxent Institution et al
as 1:2015cv02511
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lanahan
Defendant:
Patuxent Institution, Tanika Amason, Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meadows v. Patuxent Institution
as 8:2014cv02381
Plaintiff:
Charles Meadows
Defendant:
Patuxent Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simkus v. Patuxent Institute
as 1:2014cv01395
Plaintiff:
John Simkus
Defendant:
Patuxent Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
