Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Edwards v. Incyte Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00530
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Edwards
Defendant:
Incyte Corporation , Paul A. Friedman , Patricia S. Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
City of Lakeland Employees Pension Plan v. Incyte Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv00365
Plaintiff:
City of Lakeland Employees Pension Plan
Defendant:
Incyte Corporation , Paul A. Friedman , Patricia S. Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Rodriguez v. Doe et al
as 3:2012cv00663
Plaintiff:
Isidoro Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jane Doe , John Doe , Cynthia D. Kinser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arapahoe Hyundai, LLC v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04350
Plaintiff:
Arapahoe Hyundai, LLC
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Co., United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service, Inc. (Ohio)
Unknown:
Steven M Kaufmann, Paul T. Friedman, Steven M Kaufmann and others
Michigan Surgery Investment, et al v. Arman, et al
as 10-1612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHIGAN SURGERY INVESTMENT, LLC, VEI - MICHIGAN, INC. and VISIONARY ENTERPRISES, INC., fka Voluntary Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
MOHAMMED ARMAN, CARL T. BERGREN, RICARDO D. BORREGO and others
Defendant:
OAKWOOD ENTERPRISES, INC. and OAKWOOD HEALTHCARE, INC.
Michigan Surgery Investment, LLC et al v. Arman et al
as 2:2009cv14656
Plaintiff:
Michigan Surgery Investment, LLC, VEI - Michigan, Inc., Visionary Enterprises, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mohammed Arman, Carl T. Bergren, Ricardo D. Borrego and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
First Derivative Traders L.P. et al v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv06412
Plaintiff:
First Derivative Traders L.P., Bob Palmer and Gloria James-King
Defendant:
Bausch & Lomb, Inc., Ronald L. Zarrella, Alan M. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
