Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gabler v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023cv01085
Petitioner:
Paul E Gabler, II
Respondent:
United States of America, General Merrick Garland, State of Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Skurkey v. Daniel et al
as 5:2022cv00496
Plaintiff:
John V Skurkey
Defendant:
William Daniel, Paul E Quigley and Anne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thomas v. Whitten et al
as 5:2021cv00417
Defendant:
Rick Whitten and NFCC
Plaintiff:
Paul E Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merritts v. Spirit Aerosystems Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00280
Defendant:
Ronald T Kadish, Stephen Anthony Cambone, John Gilson and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Merrits and Richard Merritts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv00721
Movant:
Paul E Thomas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01156
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Mashburn v. Whetsel et al
as 5:2010cv00929
Plaintiff:
Paul E Mashburn, Jr
Defendant:
John Whetsel and Jack Herron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold et al v. City of Tulsa et al
as 4:2009cv00811
Plaintiff:
James M Arnold, Kristin J Arnold, Karim Assaf and others
Defendant:
City of Tulsa, City of Tulsa, Sonoma Grande Tulsa, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Gabler v. Davol Inc et al
as 5:2009cv01199
Plaintiff:
Paul E Gabler, II
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Spaulding v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2008cv00757
Plaintiff:
Paul E Spaulding
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
