Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Boatswain et al
as 1:2021cv01702
Defendant:
Patrick Auguste, Paul Matthew, John Doe Defendants 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Joe Schroeder Legacy, LLC et al v. Service247 of Illinois, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03201
Plaintiff:
Joe Schroeder Legacy, LLC, John Schroeder, DRYCO, LLC and others
Defendant:
Elizabeth Nelson, Nelson Group, Inc., Thomas Keffer and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 25
Roberts v. Generation Next, et al
as 20-2068
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERATION NEXT, LLC, JOHN MELANCON, DONALD PATTERSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GALE ROBERTS, individually and d/b/a "Gone Working" (Pro Se), DBA "Gone Working"
Roberts v. Generation Next, et al
as 19-2067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GALE ROBERTS
Defendant:
HOWARD TALKS, JOHN MELANCON, ANTIQUITY ENCOUNTER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GENERATION NEXT, LLC, KATHARINE COOK FISHMAN and ESTATE OF RICHARD COOK
In re: Raymond Matthews
as 16-12977
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND PAUL MATTHEWS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Raymond Matthews
as 16-12786
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND PAUL MATTHEWS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hudson et al v. Duhamel
as 1:2014cv01165
Plaintiff:
Herbert William Hudson and Danielle Nicole Garcia-Hudson
Defendant:
Paul Matthew Duhamel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pankaj Topiwala v. Kevin Wessell
as 12-2068
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PANKAJ TOPIWALA, FASTVDO, LLC and PARAMOUNT INTERNATIONAL HOLDING, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN WILLIAM WESSELL, MATT MITCHELL, a/k/a Paul Matthew Hesse and COMPANIES INCORPORATED
USA v. Paul Schmitz
as 11-12745
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL MATTHEW SCHMITZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
