Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Peck v. Rivas et al
as 2:2023cv01870
Plaintiff:
Frank M. Peck
Defendant:
Rivas, Martin, T. Manalang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
England v. Hoyt et al
as 3:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Walter England
Defendant:
Christian Hoyt, Reno Police Department and City of Reno
Interested Party:
Jacob S. Peck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coil v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv02120
Plaintiff:
David Coil
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Governor Sandoval, Governor Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peck v. Saba et al
as 2:2022cv01991
Plaintiff:
John Peck
Defendant:
Malini Saba, Akkadian, Inc., McDonald Law Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Randall v. Bally's Casino CEO and Casino Security et al
as 2:2022cv01190
Defendant:
Calvin, Bally's Casino CEO and Casino Security, Valerie Senatra and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Kenneth Randall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Peck v. Minev et al
as 2:2021cv01865
Plaintiff:
Frank M Peck
Defendant:
Michael Minev, M.D., Dr. Agustin, Dr. Manalang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peck v. Dorsey et al
as 2:2019cv01023
Defendant:
C. B. Kirschner and Jennifer A. Dorsey
Plaintiff:
Frank M. Peck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowe v. Naphcare, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00568
Defendant:
Ann Balogh, Trinidad Drozeski, Harry Duran and others
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Peck v. State of Nevada, ex rel et al
as 2:2018cv00237
Defendant:
Barbara Cegavski, Dugan, James Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
Frank M. Peck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peck v. Williams
as 2:2017cv01620
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Petitioner:
Frank M. Peck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
