Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rosas v. Boykins et al
as 1:2020cv00413
Defendant:
Lance C Knod, Davlisha J Whitmore, Pedro M Boykins and others
Plaintiff:
Arturo Rosas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Boykin et al
as 1:2019cv00306
Defendant:
Christopher L Norsworthy, Aaron L Thompkins, Bruce H Fredrick and others
Plaintiff:
Latthen Chance Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanton v. Woodard et al
as 1:2019cv00107
Defendant:
V McMullen, Wayne E Brewer, Lance C Knod and others
Plaintiff:
Luke Adam Stanton, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hood v. Allen et al
as 1:2018cv00508
Defendant:
Tod N Allen, Larelle M Canela, Laurie McCord and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Livingston et al
as 1:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Summers
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Richard Alford, Gene A Kroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Summers v. Livingston et al
as 1:2011cv00156
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Summers
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, John M Moriarty, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dan Coffman v. Pedro Boykin, et al
as 10-40379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAN COFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
PEDRO M BOYKIN, KEITH GORSUCH and DARLINDA WHEELER
Coffman v. Boykin et al
as 1:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Pedro M Boykin, Keith E Gorsuch and Darlinda Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Boykin et al
as 3:2010cv00416
Plaintiff:
Dan Coffman
Defendant:
Pedro M Boykin, Keith E Gorsuch and Darlinda Wheeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. State of Texas, et al
as 08-20792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRENT ALVON SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, it's Agency Texas Department of Criminal Justice - CID Represented by Director Nathaniel Quarterman, ALFRED JANICEK, JR., Senior Warden, MICHAEL D BARNETT, Captain of Correctional Officers and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
