Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC and UL LLC
Defendant:
Cao Peng, Shenzhen Peng Chuangxing Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tongxin Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Amazon.com Inc et al v. Peng et al
as 2:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services LLC, UL LLC and others
Defendant:
Cao Peng, Shenzhen Peng Chuangxing Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Tongxin Technology Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peng v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv00639
Defendant:
Lenovo Group, Lenovo and Microsoft Corporation
Plaintiff:
Yuzhou Peng
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Great Ocean Capital Holding, LLC v. Zhang et al
as 2:2017cv01578
Plaintiff:
Great Ocean Capital Holding, LLC
Defendant:
Peng Zhang and Zhongyuan Pan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Great Ocean Capital Holding, LLC v. Pan et al
as 2:2016cv00693
Defendant:
Peng Zhang and Zhongyuan Pan
Plaintiff:
Great Ocean Capital Holding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finkelstein v. Lee et al
as 2:2013cv02197
Plaintiff:
Jay Finkelstein
Defendant:
Dickson V. Lee, Norman Mineta, Shirley Kiang and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Russell L Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bush v. Lee et al
as 2:2011cv01910
Plaintiff:
Russell L Bush
Defendant:
Dickson V. Lee , Norman Mineta , Shirley Kiang and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Solis et al v. Super China Star Buffet et al
as 2:2009cv05025
Plaintiff:
Hilda L Solis and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Super China Star Buffet, S & M Full Love LLC, Chih-Cheng Peng and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
