Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Pauletta v. Officer Sanguinito et al

as 1:2024cv01299
Defendant:
Upper Allen Police Department, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and Officer Sanguinito
Plaintiff:
Robert Pauletta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
JILES v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al

as 2:2024cv00740
Defendant:
COUNCIL OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES and PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gilbert Martinez v. Commonwealth of PA Department of Transportation, et al
as 24-1136
Plaintiff:
GILBERT M. MARTINEZ
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and LAURELDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
DAVIS v. PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHE DOE et al

as 2:2023cv04863
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER JOHE DOE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE 24TH DISTRICT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.