Cases 1 - 10 of 693
Gardner v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-2760
Plaintiff:
PENNY GARDNER
Defendant:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Gardner v. Rodriguez, et al.
as 24-2418
Plaintiff:
PENNY GARDNER, formerly known as Penny Rodriguez
Defendant:
ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ and STATE OF WASHINGTON, Acting through and doing business as The Washington Health Care Authority
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Foshee v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
P.R. Penny Foshee and Penny Foshee
Defendant:
Lane County, Attorney General Ellen F Rosenblum, Director Betsy Imholt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gantt et al v. Penny Mac et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Paul Gantt and Edna Gantt
Defendant:
Penny Mac and David Spector
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Gantt et al v. Penny Mac Corp et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Paul Gantt and Edna Gantt
Defendant:
Penny Mac Corp, Cades Schutte LLP, Patricia J. McHenry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
