Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Amerson v. Yavapai County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2023cv08069
Plaintiff:
Ronald M Amerson
Defendant:
Yavapai County Board of Supervisors, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tutt v. Menlove et al
as 2:2022cv00890
Plaintiff:
Roderick Citron Tutt
Defendant:
James Menlove, J Adam Shepherd, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goins et al v. Wingstop et al
as 2:2021cv01362
Plaintiff:
Shana Goins, Debra Goins and Penny Goins
Defendant:
Wingstop, Tempe Police Department and Phoenix Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Olivas v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00900
Defendant:
Unknown Osborne, Penny Padget, J Adam Shepherd and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse D Olivas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00511
Defendant:
Justin Solberg, J Adam Shepherd and Penni Padgett
Plaintiff:
Raymond Junior Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00512
Defendant:
Penni Padgett, Justin Solberg and J Adam Shepherd
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gene Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuffly v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00397
Defendant:
Penni Padgett, Justin Solberg and J Adam Shepherd
Plaintiff:
Orlando James Tuffly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00399
Defendant:
Penni Padgett, Justin Solberg and J Adam Shepherd
Plaintiff:
George Irving Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goss v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00234
Defendant:
Justin Solberg, Penni Padgett, Gila, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Brett William Goss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perea v. Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00244
Defendant:
Justin Solberg, Penni Padgett, Gila, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Anthony Perea
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
