Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kindred v. Lumpkin
as 22-40347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Herman Lee Kindred
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Pennie Kempt, Assistant Warden, Michael Unit, Eric K. White and others
Johnson v. Kempt et al.
as 6:2021cv00426
Plaintiff:
Marcus Deon Johnson
Defendant:
Pennie Kempt, Sean Marshall, Daniel Jett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Garner et al.
as 6:2021cv00412
Plaintiff:
Marcus Deon Johnson
Defendant:
Cody Garner, Erik L. Brannan, Wayne Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kindred v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2021cv00166
Defendant:
Alicia McElyea, Terri L Vassilico, Margaret Price and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Kindred
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kindred v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Unknown Gould, Bobby Lumpkin, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Kindred
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kindred v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2020cv00562
Defendant:
Alicia McElyea, Eric White, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Kindred
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kindred v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2020cv00540
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Moore, Eric White, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Kindred
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Stiefer et al
as 6:2020cv00479
Defendant:
Charles O Meador, II, Kirk Stiefer and Penny Kempt
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Sheppard, Jr. v. Kirk Etiefer, et al
as 20-40555
Defendant / Appellee:
Assistant Warden Penny Kempt, Senior Warden Kirk Etiefer and Assistant Warden Charles O. Meador, II
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr.
Sheppard v. Etiefer et al
as 6:2020cv00343
Defendant:
Charles O Meador, II, Kirk Etiefer and Penny Kempt
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Sheppard, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
