Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Martin-Perez v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00959
Plaintiff:
Tara Martin-Perez
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. JAO Enterprises, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
JAO Enterprises, LLC, Jaime Magana, Abel Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Sepanek
as 0:2014cv00038
Petitioner:
Israel Perez
Respondent:
Michael Sepanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez v. Rodabaugh et al
as 3:2013cv01122
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Andrew Clyde Rodabaugh , A.R.E. Machine Products, Inc. and A.R.E. Machine Products, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Perez v. Off Duty Police Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00935
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Off Duty Police Services, Inc., Darrell Spurgeon and Bonnie Spurgeon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Morales v. USA
as 3:2013cv07314
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Perez J. Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Perez v. Hofmeister et al
as 5:2013cv00156
Defendant:
George Hofmeister , Bernard Tew , Bluegrass Investment Management, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Perez v. La Courciere et al
as 5:2013cv00158
Defendant:
Robert La Courciere , Pamela Babbish , George Hofmeister and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Perez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jorge Perez
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Calloway v. Beasley et al
as 3:2013cv00410
Plaintiff:
Kim V. Calloway
Defendant:
Roderick Beasley, Steven Kelsey, Jorge Soto-Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
