Cases 1 - 10 of 103
Ocampo-Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2989
Petitioner:
LORENA OCAMPO-GOMEZ, EMILY JULIET DELGADO-OCAMPO, JAQUELINE DELGADO-OCAMPO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Workman v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 24-2033
Petitioner:
THOMAS WORKMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, JASMINE MARTINEZ, ROBERT SALAS and others
Badanac, et al. v. Garland
as 23-4342
Petitioner:
ELVIRA PERLA BADANAC, GEORGE MIREL STEFAN, MARIA IZABELA STEFAN and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
OPENED IN ERROR
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Thomas Workman and Unknown Persons
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Rufina (Perla) Sanchez, Jasmine Martinez and others
Respondent:
Unknown Pesons
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Wallace v. The Necessity Retail REIT, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06791
Plaintiff:
Edward Wallace
Defendant:
The Necessity Retail REIT, Inc., Edward M. Weil, Jr., Lisa D. Kabnick and others
Wang v. Necessity Retail REIT, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06456
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Necessity Retail REIT, Inc., Edward M. Weil, Jr., Lisa Kabnick and others
O'Dell v. Necessary Retail REIT, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv06302
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Necessary Retail REIT, Inc., Michael Weil, Lisa Kabnick and others
KNUEPPEL v. IDEAL CONCEPTS, INC.
as 5:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
PERLA KNUEPPEL
Defendant:
IDEAL CONCEPTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Castaneda Martinez v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Perla Isamar Castaneda Martinez
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Laura B. Zuchowski and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gomez Gomez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1361
Petitioner:
WILLY EDUBINA GOMEZ GOMEZ, LUIS YORDI CATUC GOMEZ, PERLA ESTRELLA CATUC GOMEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
