Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Peter Pototsky v. City of Nogales, et al
as 20-15927
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH BARTH, DOES, named as Spouse of Keith D. Barth; named as Spouse of Michele Cardillo, SCARLETT BUNTING and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER POTOTSKY
Pototsky v. Nogales, City of et al
as 4:2020cv00078
Defendant:
Nogales, City of, Scarlett Bunting, Keith Barth and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Pototsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Peter Pototsky
as 18-10125
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PETER POTOTSKY, AKA Peter Gregory Pototsky
Pototsky v. United States Border Patrol et al
as 4:2014cv02418
Plaintiff:
Peter Pototsky
Defendant:
United States Border Patrol, United States Customs and Border Protection, Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pototsky v. United States Department of the Army
as 4:2012cv00764
Plaintiff:
Peter Pototsky
Defendant:
United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Peter Pototsky v. Atlas Air Incorporated, et al
as 10-15991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER POTOTSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
ATLAS AIR INCORPORATED, THOMAS J. KASSIN, FORD and others
Peter Pototsky v. Atlas Air Incorporated, et al
as 09-17748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER POTOTSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
ATLAS AIR INCORPORATED, THOMAS J. KASSIN, FORD and others
Peter Pototsky v. Department of Homeland Securit, et al
as 09-15247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER POTOTSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and W. RALPH BASHAM, agency head
Peter Pototsky v. Atlas Air Incorporated, et al
as 09-15105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER POTOTSKY
Defendant - Appellee:
ATLAS AIR INCORPORATED, THOMAS J. KASSIN, FORD and others
Pototsky v. Basham et al
as 4:2007cv00144
Plaintiff:
Peter Pototsky
Defendant:
W Ralph Basham, Richard Hales, Michael B Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
