Cases 1 - 10 of 299
Snedeker v. State of Colorado, et al
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
BRADFORD WAYNE SNEDEKER, SR.
Defendant:
STATE OF COLORADO, ANJALI NANDI, DENISE MERTZ and others
Reid (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv01114
Petitioner:
Richard Reid
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, English, A. Matevousian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Aigbekaen (PS) v. Peters et al
as 1:2024cv00928
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen and Raymond L. Aigbekaen
Defendant:
Collette Peters, Michael Aubin and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aigbekaen (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen and Raymond L. Aigbekaen
Defendant:
USA, Collette Peters, John F. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Calloway, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
GEOFFREY CALLOWAY, JENNIFER JONES, PHILLIP WIESER and others
Garcia (PS) v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
James Anderson, Clark Smith, City of Colorado Springs, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson (PS) v. Calloway et al
as 1:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Geoffrey Calloway, Jennifer Jones, Philip Wieser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 24-1036
Petitioner:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS ADMAX SUPERINTENDENT CUSTODIAN, UNITED STATES PORBATION OFFICES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF COLORADO and others
Cramer v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Peter Eugene Cramer
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noe v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Peter George Noe
Respondent:
Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
