Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Gallagher et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv12900
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Gallagher, Jeanne Hey and Jimmy Phan
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, DOES 1 through 100 and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Bonecutter et al v. HCA Healthcare, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Brittany Bonecutter, Cynthia Benbow, Scott Dry and others
Defendant:
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Silvers et al v. HCA Healthcare, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00684
Plaintiff:
Gary Silvers and Richard Marous
Defendant:
HCA Healthcare, Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Gregory Crossman, Marissa Aragon, Abby Rubenfeld and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Digital Media Solutions, LLC v. South University of Ohio, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00145
Defendant:
South University of Ohio, LLC, DCEH Education Holdings, LLC, DC South University of Ohio LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Digital Media Solutions, LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Buncher Company, Stephanie Porreca, Historic Berriman-Morgan, LLC and others
Intervenor:
Benefit Administrative Systems, LLC, Thomas J Perrelli, U.S. Bank, National Association and others
Interested Party:
HEFCO Meadowbrook LLC, Store SPE 1200 Lincoln, LLC, 3601 Sunflower LLC and others
Receiver:
Mark E. Dottore
Petitioner:
Douglas Emmett 2010, llc
Amicus Curiae:
United States
Respondent:
Mark A. Kompa and FSP Pacific Center LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wedding Table Project Partnership et al v. Cardwell et al
as 2:2014cv14054
Plaintiff:
Wedding Table Project Partnership , Te Phan and Minh Phan
Defendant:
Dave Cardwell , Xinqi He and Merryl Iraha
Cross_defendant:
Suitcase, LLC and Merryl Iraha
Cross_claimant:
Dave Cardwell and Xinqi He
Counter_claimant:
Dave Cardwell and Xinqi He
Counter_defendant:
Minh Phan , Te Phan and Wedding Table Project Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
