Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Phelps v. City of Kansas City, Missouri et al
as 5:2011cv06078
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Phelps
Defendant:
City of Kansas City, Missouri , Doyle McCollum and John C. Davenport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Phelps et al v. Gresham et al
as 1:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Rondy Phelps , April Mobley and Cindy Carey
Defendant:
Clark E. Gresham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phelps et al v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv05441
Plaintiff:
Wayne Phelps and Carolann Wade
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cynthia Phelps v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I
as 10-6085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYNTHIA PHELPS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Phelps et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2010cv03157
Plaintiff:
Wayne Phelps and Carolann Wade
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
PHELPS v. BUCKLES et al
as 5:2009cv01952
Plaintiff:
JASON PHELPS
Defendant:
JAMES BUCKLES, PENSKE TRUCK LEASING, TRU SERVICE LOGISTICS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Phelps v. Yi et al
as 2:2007cv02368
Plaintiff:
Molly Phelps and Molly Phelps
Defendant:
Daniel Yi and Clifton Bencke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Phelps v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv00291
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Phelps
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Smith et al v. Hensel Phelps Construction Company et al
as 4:2007cv00153
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Smith, Daniel Thomas Smith, Daniel Thomas Smith and others
Defendant:
Hensel Phelps Construction Company, Hensel Phelps Construction Company, Richard Jezo Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
