Cases 1 - 10 of 4,438
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01822
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
LISTER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LISTER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, OFFICER REGINALD GRAHAM and JOHN DOES 1-4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lillian Graham v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1707
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN GRAHAM
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS, PHILA POLICE DEPT 39TH DISTRICT and others
Lillian Graham v. FEMA, et al
as 24-1708
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN GRAHAM
Defendant:
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Derrick Jacobs v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1696
Plaintiff:
DERRICK U. JACOBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
DAVIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01563
Plaintiff:
KEITH DAVIS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMON PLEAS JUDGE TRACY BRANDEIS ROMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
