Miller Act Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Cosco Fire Protection, Inc. v. NEI Contracting & Engineering, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv02078
Plaintiff: Cosco Fire Protection, Inc.
Defendant: NEI Contracting & Engineering, Inc. and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
The Engineered Metals Company v. HGL Construction Inc et al
as 5:2017cv01071
Defendant: HGL Construction Inc and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Plaintiff: The Engineered Metals Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
Allied Building Products Corp. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company et al
as 1:2017cv02274
Plaintiff: Allied Building Products Corp.
Defendant: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company , Meltech Corporation, Inc. and CIC, LLC
Cross_claimant: Meltech Corporation, Inc. and CIC, LLC
Cross_defendant: CIC, LLC , Meltech Corporation, Inc. and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Veterans Contracting, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01315
Defendant: Veterans Contracting, Inc. and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Plaintiff: United States of America and North Bay Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Meltech Corporation, Inc. et al
as 8:2017cv01626
Plaintiff: Structural Concepts & Components, Inc. and United States of America
Defendant: Meltech Corporation, Inc. and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
JBlanco Enterprises, Inc. et al v. David Boland, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02685
Defendant: David Boland, Inc, Western Surety Company and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Plaintiff: JBlanco Enterprises, Inc and JBlanco Enterprises, Inc.
3Rd Party Plaintiff: David Boland, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United Stated of America, for the use and benefit of: Anderson Audio Visual- San Diego, Inc. et al v. Office Design Group et al
as 3:2016cv02267
Defendant: Office Design Group, NEI Contracting and Engineering, Inc., Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of: Anderson Audio Visual - San Diego, Inc. and Anderson Audio Visual - San Diego, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of: Anchor Construction Specialties, Inc. v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company et al
as 3:2016cv01620
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of: Anchor Construction Specialties, Inc.
Defendant: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company , NEI Contracting and Engineering, Inc., Suretec Indemnity Company and others
Thirdparty_defendant: Onesource Distributors LLC, Advanced Acoustic Contractors, Inc., Harbor Equipment Rentals, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff: Suretec Indemnity Company
Cross_defendant: Eric Barajas and NEI Contracting and Engineering, Inc.
Cross_claimant: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3133
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States for the use and benefit of Safway Services, LLC v. NEI Contracting and Engineering, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01389
Plaintiff: United States for the use and benefit Safway Services, LLC
Defendant: NEI Contracting and Engineering, Inc. and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Other Property Damage
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company et al
as 3:2015cv00354
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Blue Star Steel, Inc.
Defendant: Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, NEI Contracting and Engineering, Inc., American Contractors Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?