Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Arsen Manson, et al v. Philip Gutierrez
as 22-55648
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARSEN MANSON
Plaintiff:
HEALTHBUDPRO, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge of U.S. Central District Court
Arsen Manson v. USA, et al
as 22-55651
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARSEN MANSON
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of The United States, official capacity, PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, U.S. Central District Court of CA Judge, official capacity and others
Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes, et al
as 22-55496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINE SAWICKY
Defendant / Appellee:
TAO SYKES, Manuel Real Beneficiary, PERCY ANDERSON, PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ and others
Arsen Manson v. The United States et al
as 2:2022cv03294
Plaintiff:
Arsen Manson
Defendant:
The United States, Kamala D. Harris, Philip S. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raiser v. Gelmis et al
as 1:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Aaron Raiser
Defendant:
Susan Gelmis, Roslynn R. Mauskopf, Mary H. Murguia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Christine Sawicky v. Tao Sykes et al
as 2:2021cv09023
Plaintiff:
Christine Sawicky
Defendant:
Tao Sykes, Percy Anderson, Philip S. Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Arsen Manson v. Philip S. Gutierrez
as 2:2021cv09300
Plaintiff:
Arsen Manson and Healthbudpro Inc.
Defendant:
Philip S. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Holmes v. Philip Gutierrez
as 21-55489
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, Judge, U.S. District Court
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. HOLMES
Michael Holmes v. Philip S Gutierrez
as 2:2021cv03449
Defendant:
Judge Philip S Gutierrez
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Kinney v. Philip Gutierrez
as 19-15564
Defendant / Appellee:
PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, U.S. District Court Judge
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
