Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Stenger v. Freeman et al
as 6:2017mc00058
Plaintiff:
Phillip S. Stenger
Defendant:
David Keith Freeman, Jedburgh Group International, Inc., Dale W. Toler and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Stenger v. Freeman et al
as 6:2017mc00059
Plaintiff:
Phillip S. Stenger
Defendant:
David Keith Freeman, Jedburgh Group International, Inc. and C.I. Solar Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Phillip Stenger v. David Freeman, et al
as 15-2588
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PHILLIP S. STENGER, Receiver
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID KEITH FREEMAN
Defendant:
JEDBURGH GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC., DALE W. TOLER and C.I. SOLAR SOLUTIONS, INC.
Hogue v. Stenger & Stenger PC et al
as 1:2014cv01143
Plaintiff:
Renetha Sue Hogue
Defendant:
Stenger & Stenger PC and Phillip S. Stenger
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Stenger v. Freeman et al
as 4:2014cv10999
Plaintiff:
Phillip S. Stenger
Defendant:
David Keith Freeman, Jedburgh Group International, Inc., Dale W. Toler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Watson et al
as 5:2011mc00009
Defendant:
Cash Flow Financial LLC, Michael Potts, The Jedburgh Group and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Receiver:
Phillip S Stenger
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Watson et al
as 1:2011mc00006
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Alan James Watson, Michael Potts, Cash Flow Financial LLC and others
Receiver:
Phillip S. Stenger
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Watson et al
as 2:2011mc00029
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Alan James Watson, Michael Potts, Cash Flow Financial LLC and others
Receiver:
Phillip S. Stenger
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
