Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Bonilla v. Hamilton
as 4:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Phyllis J. Hamilton and U.S District Court Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Hamilton et al
as 4:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton and Jacquelyn Lovrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Hamilton
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ou-Young v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 3:2023cv06597
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Merrick B. Garland, Gregory J. Ahern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Bonilla v. Hamilton
as 4:2023cv05965
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara
as 4:2023mc80222
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Bonilla v. United States District Court et al
as 4:2023cv03307
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
United States District Court, Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton and Court Clerk's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2022cv05066
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
