Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States v. John Pickens, Jr.
as 22-1292
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Sheldon Pickens, Jr.
Raevon Parker v. John Pickens, et al
as 20-2281
Defendant / Appellee:
John Pickens, Detective /# 4636, J. Lanaman, Detective /#4759, Unknown Crumper, Detective and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raevon Terrell Parker
Uju Onuachi v. Master Builders Inc., et al
as 19-2938
Defendant / Appellee:
Harry S. Peterson Company, The Western Group, Cassem, Adams, Gotch & Douglas Law Firm and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Uju Onuachi
Uju Onuachi v. Master Builders Inc., et al
as 19-1196
Defendant / Appellee:
Heart Consultants, PC, John R. Timmermier, John K. Green and others
Defendant:
Timmermier, Gross, & Prentiss Law Firm, Pansing, Hogan Law Firm, Wolfe, Snowden, Hurd & Ahl, L.L.P. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Uju Onuachi
Shawn Pickens v. BNSF Railway Company, et al
as 19-1124
Defendant:
Gary D. Anderson
Defendant / Appellant:
BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Shawn Pickens
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv01329
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
United States v. LaDarron Pickens
as 09-3943
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
LaDarron Deondre Pickens, also known as Deondre Pickens
USA v. Arkansas, State of, et al
as 4:1978cv00025
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of , Douglas W Harp , Lawrence E Gwyn and others
Intervenor:
Wendell Adams , Larry Astin , Ron Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Pickens
as 0:2008cv00947
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Clinton Pickens
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
