Cases 21 - 30 of 1,216
Weaver v. Ryder System, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04943
Plaintiff:
Pierre Weaver
Defendant:
Ryder System, Inc. and Ryder Transportation Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
USA v. Pierre Hardaway
as 23-13605
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PIERRE CORTEZ HARDAWAY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04922
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Pierre v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 0:2023cv61980
Plaintiff:
Mirlande Pierre
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKinney v. Oliver et al
as 1:2023cv04621
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr.
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Julie Mullins, Matthew Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solide v Vision Solar FL, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv01932
Defendant:
Pierre Solide, Vision Solar, LLC and Vision Solar FL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv61889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Frank Pierre v. State of Florida, et al
as 23-13264
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANK PIERRE
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
PIERRE-PAUL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv17892
Plaintiff:
RONALD PIERRE-PAUL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
